Unveiling the Truth About Defaults in
Real Estate Crowdfunding

9/12/24

As an accredited investor seeking to diversify my portfolio through real estate crowdfunding, I sought to perform some due diligence on all the major platforms. My mission was simple yet crucial: to understand the true risk profile of various real estate investment platforms by asking one tough question - "How many defaults have you had?" The responses I received were not only enlightening but also raised significant concerns about transparency in the burgeoning real estate crowdfunding industry.

Let's get into the dirt.

Yieldstreet: The Vague Redirect

My investigation began with Yieldstreet, a popular alternative investment platform known for wide range of asset classes (including weird ones like "transportation" and "legal fees.") Their response was disappointingly evasive. Instead of providing concrete data on defaults, they apologized for a delay and directed me to their "historical performance" page. They emphasized their "extensive due diligence" process, but the lack of specific default information in the email itself left me questioning the depth of this due diligence (read my review of Yieldstreet for more on this.) Their vague approach to such a critical question made me wonder about the real risks lurking behind their investment opportunities.

(By the way, they're getting sued right now in a class action, so keep that in mind.)

Yieldstreet's reply to my email asking about their number of defaults

Fundrise: Information Overload Strategy

Next, I turned to Fundrise, another leading real estate crowdfunding platform known for its low minimum investment of $10. Their response was detailed and informative, but strategically avoided my specific inquiry. They elaborated on their diversified investment approach, mentioning various investment types like "equity deals," "joint venture (JV) deals," "preferred equity," and "senior debt deals." While this showcased their range of real estate investment options in a salesy way, it didn't address my core issue of defaults. They directed me to their "Completed Section" and "client returns page," but buried in this wealth of positive information was a noticeable absence of clear default statistics. This underhanded tactic of overwhelming me with favorable stuff while sidestepping negative information on defaults raised red flags about their transparency in risk communication.

It's like pulling teeth to get a candid numerical answer on the subject of defaults...

Fundrise's reply to my email asking about their number of defaults

Groundfloor: The "Data Dig" Strategy

Groundfloor's approach was a little different. They provided links to their "Asset Management Monthly Update" and "Q1 2023 Portfolio Analysis" on their blog. This still required me to sift through extensive reports to extract default information on the historical performance of their real estate investment offerings. Once again, this method of information sharing placed the burden of analysis on the investor, potentially obscuring crucial risk data amidst a sea of disorganized metrics. It’s also not entirely clear upon visiting their homepage that this information is hidden in a series of blog posts. Most other platforms have a dedicated “track record” page that's easy to find, and Groundfloor’s approach to presenting these disclosures seems like intentional obfuscation.

Groundfloor's reply to my email asking about their number of defaults

CrowdStreet: The Marketplace Deflection

CrowdStreet's response introduced a new dimension to my investigation. They positioned themselves as a marketplace facilitating connections between investors and real estate sponsors. Boasting "almost 800 offerings" with "just under 200 realized," they provided a general performance list but suggested I review each sponsor's track record individually. This deflection to individual sponsors' performance rather than platform-wide statistics made me question their overall approach to risk management and their responsibility in curating safe investment opportunities. (And as we all know from the Nightingale scandal, there's a lot to be concerned about!)

CrowdStreet's reply to my email asking about their number of defaults

RealtyMogul: Generic Reply

Similar to CrowdStreet, RealtyMogul provided a track record link but emphasized that they're "not the GP on these offerings." I appreciated the bluntness, but I had also hoped for a specific number of defaults. As an investor, I also found myself wondering about the added value and protection offered by RealtyMogul if they distance themselves from the performance of their listed investments. I honestly expected better from a platform that takes an active role in vetting and managing assets (as opposed to CrowdStreet's laissez-faire marketplace model.) Once again, I was left wondering why they couldn't state a number outright...

RealtyMogul's reply to my email asking about their number of defaults

Arrived Homes: A Glimpse of Transparency

In a refreshing turn, Arrived Homes provided the most direct response in my real estate crowdfunding inquiry. They reported zero defaults for their Private Credit Fund — welcome clarity amidst the sea of vagueness! That said, this transparency came with a caveat — the fund had only launched in May. While their openness was commendable, the newness of the fund limited the long-term significance of their perfect record, and reminded me of the importance of track record length in assessing real estate investments.

I suppose it's not surprising that the one platform with zero defaults would be willing to give me an exact number.

Arrived Homes's reply to my email asking about their number of defaults

Key Insights for Real Estate Investors

This deep dive into real estate crowdfunding platforms revealed several critical issues:

1. Each platform had its unique way of presenting (or avoiding) default information, making it challenging to compare risks across different real estate investment opportunities.
2. Many platforms pointed to sponsor performance rather than taking ownership of overall platform risk, which led to some pretty eyebrow-raising questions about their role in investor protection.
3. Some platforms seemed to bury potential negative information under an avalanche of positive performance metrics, which could potentially mislead investors about the true risk profile of their real estate investments.
4. Most platforms avoided giving a simple, straightforward answer to a direct question about defaults, a concerning trend in an industry built on trust and transparency. C’mon, people — it’s not that hard to simply state a number!
5. The investigation revealed a lot about the different operational models of real estate crowdfunding platforms, from hands-on investment managers to mere facilitators, each with different implications for investor risk. Personally, I prefer platforms that play an active role in managing assets, because they're not outsourcing accountability in a sketchy way.

The Future of Real Estate Crowdfunding

As the real estate crowdfunding market continues to evolve and mature, there's a pressing need for more standardized, transparent reporting on defaults and other key risk metrics. Platforms that can provide clear, accessible information on these crucial factors are likely to gain a competitive edge, attracting discerning investors who value honesty and open communication in their real estate investment decisions. For potential investors in real estate crowdfunding, this investigation once again speaks to the importance of thorough due diligence. Don't be satisfied with vague, slippery answers, and don't let yourself get overwhelmed by positive data. Ask direct questions about defaults, risk management strategies, and platform involvement in investment oversight. Don't settle for anything less than the high level of transparency you deserve.

As I continue evaluating real estate crowdfunding investments, I'll be prioritizing platforms that demonstrate an unwavering commitment to transparency and straightforward communication. In an industry dealing with significant sums of investor capital, clarity about investment risks isn't merely preferable — it's a basic requirement.

As of September 2024, the real estate crowdfunding sector stands at a crossroads. We’re standing in the aftermath of the SEC’s investigations into Yieldstreet, CrowdStreet, and Fundrise. Will the industry embrace radical transparency and standardized risk reporting, or continue with the current patchwork of disclosure practices? The platforms that lead in openness and clarity may well become the preferred choice for savvy investors seeking reliable, well-understood real estate investment opportunities in this dynamic market.

Remember, in the uncertain world of real estate investments, what you don't know can indeed hurt you. As we navigate the complexities of real estate crowdfunding, let's all champion transparency, demand clear information, and make truly informed investment decisions. The future of the real estate crowdfunding industry depends on it.